Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ISpy(2010 series)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jayjg (talk) 02:25, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- ISpy(2010 series) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Sarilox (talk) 04:54, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:11, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. Niteshift36 (talk) 19:41, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Too soon to tell about notability. JBsupreme (talk) 07:19, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Per WP:CRYSTAL. Joe Chill (talk) 15:29, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. Ks0stm (T•C•G) 23:34, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - unreferenced, WP:CRYSTAL -- frankly, not sure this isn't a hoax. --EEMIV (talk) 22:53, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.