The G-spot 'doesn't appear to exist', say researchers
- Thread starter Namreg
- Start date
I can only speak from personal experience when I say it does exsist. I have on many ocassions used it to my advantage... enough said. Those reasearchers need to get out the lab and take the study to the streets. They will find out soon enough.
GregCentauro
Banned
I only believe in things I can see. Pictures or it isn't true. :tongue:
Will E Worm
Conspiracy...
G-spot is a myth
Article
John Q. and Susie Q Public will believe almost anything you tell them.
Until you tell them something else. :tongue:
Article
John Q. and Susie Q Public will believe almost anything you tell them.
Until you tell them something else. :tongue:
They would most likely look at a naked woman an run away screaming. Also after reading the article it was test about twins and the g-spot... What dopes. How do people get the funding they do! Grrrrrr it just makes me mad.
mr google
Banned
I'm glad to hear that.
Would you both be willing to visit the lab to provide conclusive proof to end this debate? :2 cents: :wave2:
jasonk282
Banned
They would most likely look at a naked woman an run away screaming. Also after reading the article it was test about twins and the g-spot... What dopes. How do people get the funding they do! Grrrrrr it just makes me mad.
I can just see it now
Scientist- O.K so we got this theory about women that we can prove scientificly
Funding Rep- go on....
Scientist-Well we need money to prove that the G-spot in twins is a figment of their imagination.
Funding Rep-............YES! I see where you are going here is your money good day sirs.
What you have to look out for is the language in which the media and the scientists themselves put on these kinds of claims. The OP's articles as well as the ones I’ve quoted are both very ambiguous in their claims and in the use of language they promote them.
Take the thread title, for example: 'The G-spot doesn't appear to exist' or from Wills articles 'The evidence is far too weak to support the reality of the G-spot'. Both don't suggest that either of those studies are making a fundamental claim about its existence or not. They're just making a suggestion as to what their observations have shown. If there was fundamental proof then it would be reported as such but as it's not, what's the big deal? We get studies such as these on what seems like a weekly basis.
All you have to do is wait a while until the next story comes out that states "scientists have shown that there might be a G-spot".
Only if you post a video of yourself inserting a sharp pointy object deep into your urethra. If you really want it that's the price you'll have to pay.
Let's see how determined you are
jasonk282
Banned
Last time I went to you Limo you put me into the Figure Four Leg lock, this time I got Sting with me, no not that Sting. This Sting :sing:Roxanneeeeee:sing:
Will E Worm
Conspiracy...
I agree. :hatsoff:
Oh, brother.
If it's to be known females are obsolete.You can go to a porn agency and hire someone or go to the Bunny Ranch.
There are many options. All the fun and none of the nagging.
Not that I would, but females need to understand if someone likes them enough to go out with them and especially marry the, they should count themselves lucky.
:tongue:I'll find someone when I choose or go to another country and have my pick of the litter. :hatsoff:
WOOOOOOOOOO! :scream:
Similar threads
